Table of ContentsChapters
This issue was prepared in collaboration with the Maximizing Access and Quality (MAQ) Initiative of the United States Agency for International Development's Office of Population and Reproductive Health. The MAQ Initiative supports research and evidence-based interventions to promote access and quality of reproductive health and family planning services. ![]() Published by the INFO Project, Center for Communication Programs, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA. Volume XXXII, Number 1, |
Health care organizations should consider both clients’ and providers’ needs when setting schedules for service delivery. Clients can obtain services more easily when offered convenient hours, flexible scheduling, and follow-up that ensures continuity of care (17). Providers can do their work better when given sufficient time during the day to perform responsibilities other than seeing clients—such as completing paperwork—and when given adequate breaks. Principles for Tailoring |
|||||
Principles in Action Senegal: Improving Continuity of CareIn 1998 and 1999 Senegal’s family planning organization Association Sénégalaise de Bien-Être Familial (ASBEF) conducted a quality improvement exercise at a clinic in the coastal town of St. Louis. Analyzing service statistics, the quality team found that many clients were not returning for their follow-up visits. In response, clinic staff devised a strategy. The clinic established a way, through its filing system, to track clients who did not return for follow-up appointments. Community outreach workers visited these clients at home to find out why they had not returned to the clinic. The outreach workers also explained the importance of follow-up and encouraged clients to revisit the clinic. At the same time, providers in the clinic began to emphasize follow-up during counseling sessions. They told clients specifically when and where their next visit was scheduled. Providers scheduled the next visit to coincide with the clients’ needs for contraceptive resupply. As a result, the number of clients who returned for services increased steadily—from fewer than 100 clients per month before the strategy was put into effect in 1998 to over 400 per month in May 1999 after implementation (37, 81). |
Convey guidelines for follow-up clearly. Clinics should have an organized system in place to help clients return to the clinic as needed (see box right). Family planning providers can explain routine reasons for return, such as contraceptive resupply or a next injection, and discuss how often the client should come back. Providers also need to ensure that follow-up is appropriate to the contraceptive method and that excessive follow-up requirements do not discourage continued use. For instance, providers can give women up to a year’s supply of oral contraceptives. They do not need to return to the clinic sooner unless they have problems (125).
Telling clients when and where to return for a visit makes it clear whether follow-up care is necessary—a point that many clients may otherwise not know. Providers need to distinguish between routine care and emergency care and to explain separately the reasons to see a doctor or nurse immediately, such as signs of possible complications associated with the client’s family planning method (46). Studies find that many providers discuss the return visit and track when clients return, but that others do not do so consistently (6, 58, 75, 112).
Scheduling appointments in advance encourages clients to return for follow-up visits. Programs with community-based links can maintain relationships with clients through health workers’ home visits, rather than requiring trips to a clinic (113). Even follow-up after female sterilization or vasectomy can be handled in a home visit (46).
Make gatekeeping appropriate to the need. The provider’s role as gatekeeper often affects how and when clients receive services and even whether clients receive services at all (103). Providers are gatekeepers in the sense that they manage the client’s treatment plan. They have the authority to decide on a course of care and either to provide care themselves or to refer clients elsewhere. Providers must ensure that in their role as gate-keepers they do not impose unnecessary medical barriers to care (see Remove unnecessary barriers that hinder access to care in chapter 2.). Since clients know their own needs for such services as family planning, client preferences, not provider preferences, should guide health care decisions to the extent possible (118).
Service providers are not the only gatekeepers at a clinic. Receptionists, clinic guards, and anyone else who affects clients’ access to services are gatekeepers. Clinic guards, for example, can prevent some people seeking care from entering the clinic, while receptionists can control the order in which clients are seen. Managers can ensure that these gatekeepers make it as easy as possible for clients to obtain services. They can inform staff about the location and hours of all services offered, establish and display client check-in procedures, and require that guards keep the clinic open to all during clinic hours.
![]() |
Information & Knowledge for Optimal Health (INFO) Project 111 Market Place Suite 310, Baltimore, MD 21202 Phone: 410-659-6300 Fax: 410-659-6266 Security & Privacy Policy Disclaimer: The information provided on this web site is not official U.S. Government information and does not represent the views or positions of the U.S. Agency for International Development or the U.S. Government. |
![]() |